Study: Comparison of Clinical Study Results Reported in medRxiv Preprints vs Peer-reviewed Journal Articles. Image Credit: Jarretera/Shutterstock Background Preprints posted on servers such as ...

What’s Wrong With Peer Review? A series of high-profile retractions has raised questions about the process used by scientific and medical journals to decide which studies are worthy of publication.

Study examines AI's role in peer review among top 100 medical journals, revealing that while most journals provide AI guidelines, a majority prohibit its use due to confidentiality and ethical ...

The journals are absolutely right to worry; ChatGPT and, presumably, its A.I. successors yet to come represent a potential existential threat to the peer review process—a fundamental mechanism ...

In clinical fields, peer review also has a protective role. Before a study about a new medication, procedure or care model gains traction, it is typically evaluated by others in the field.

Overall, 194 authors have reported publishing articles in peer-reviewed journals with the support of the Dissertation to Publication workshop.

Scientists want pay for peer review, freedom to submit to multiple journals. Publishers say their practices have been common for decades ...