Two federal judges in the same courthouse came to different opinions on whether AI firms are breaching copyrights, signaling more legal confusion.

Microsoft's AI faces a lawsuit from authors claiming its Megatron model used 200,000 pirated books for training. This is the ...

Midjourney has launched its first video generation V1 model, a web-based tool that allows users to animate still images into ...

On Monday, Anthropic won most of its case against three authors over its use of their works to train its AI. Judge William ...

On this episode of "Uncanny Valley," we explore Disney and Universal's lawsuit against Midjourney, which could be ...

The ruling in a case involving Amazon-backed Anthropic lends credibility to the notion that AI video generators that could ...

Meta won a lawsuit over its use of copyrighted books to train AI models, with a judge ruling the practice falls under fair ...

A federal judge sided with Meta on Wednesday in a lawsuit brought against the company by 13 book authors, including Sarah ...

“The Court has no choice but to grant summary judgment to Meta on the plaintiffs’ claim that the company violated copyright ...

A US judge has ruled that using books to train artificial intelligence (AI) software is not a violation of US copyright ...

We're seeing AI copyright cases come before the court system and sorting through their rulings. These cases will have direct ...

Using copyrighted books to train generative AI (genAI) systems is “quintessentially transformative” and therefore qualifies ...