When the words “climate change” can have your ad refused, but fossil fuel companies can spread misinformation with impunity, there is a double standard in advertising.
If humanity wants to throw brakes on climate change, it has to step up its control over human sources of methane emissions.
Opinion
4hOpinion
Centre Daily Times on MSNClimate watch: Moving to a carbon-free future is common senseWe need common-sense solutions for our energy needs. That starts with bipartisan leadership to address climate change in a way that is good for the economy and good for people.” ...
By eliminating the consideration of carbon’s costs, the Trump administration not only stands to eliminate the consumer benefits, but it will also allow carbon emissions to grow unabated, intensifying ...
The data indicates that over 50 percent of these emissions can be attributed to just 36 high-emitting companies, with ...
By pulling out of two global climate finance programs, the United States has increased challenges for vulnerable countries.
To help cover this rising bill, New York State has passed a new “Climate Change Superfund Law” that asks major fossil fuel companies to pay up, based on their historic sales of coal, gas and oil.
Climate change, perhaps, used to be a topic where reasoned discussion was possible, particularly if people were lacking basic ...
Catholic advocates worry about environmental policy shifts worried, but also stress the need for personal responsibility and ...
According to the latest update to the Carbon Majors database, produced by InfluenceMap, just 36 companies are linked to more than half of global carbon ...
A scientific study links South Sudan's record-breaking heatwave to global warming and shows how women and girls are more ...
Chris Wright’s remarks were welcomed at a time when countries across the region have felt whipsawed by cuts to longstanding ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results