The New Republic on MSN4dOpinion
The Supreme Court Muddied the Clean Water Act Yet AgainAmy Coney Barrett joined the liberal justices in a dissent against Samuel Alito—and his thinly veiled policy agenda.
Tuesday that the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) rules for the city of San Francisco under the Clean Water Act on raw ...
In a case that centered on unusual alliances and unpleasant descriptions of raw sewage being released into San Francisco Bay ...
The U.S. Supreme Court sided with San Francisco on Tuesday in a ruling that narrows the Clean Water Act. The case pitted a ...
San Francisco argued that Clean Water Act permits should function like recipes that restrict specific ingredients in a dish, ...
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court substantially weakened federal limitations on raw sewage discharge into nearby bodies of water.
A years-long dispute over a San Francisco stormwater discharge permit came to an end Tuesday with a decision by the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in favor of the city, but the earlier-than-expected ...
But over the past 50 years, some places have occasionally run afoul of the act. In San Francisco, the wastewater system ...
Conservatives on the Supreme Court have again rescued the nation from out-of-control bureaucrats inflicting prohibitive costs ...
On Tuesday, March 4, the United States Supreme Court issued a major decision limiting the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency’s ...
An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...
The justices ruled that the agency cannot impose generic prohibitions against violating water quality standards.
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback