Leaders must find ways to dismantle this state’s many political, legal and financial hurdles to getting anything done.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett said the Supreme Court reached a "puzzling" conclusion in a case on water regulations issued by the EPA.

The Supreme Court of the United States ruled on March 4 that it had sided with the city of San Francisco and against the U.S.

On Tuesday, March 4, the United States Supreme Court issued a major decision limiting the scope of the Environmental Protection Agency’s ...

In a narrow 5-4 decision, the Supreme Court ruled to limit the EPA's authority to issue broad water pollution permits under ...

A newly released report from a special legislative committee declares that to deal with housing, homelessness, water supply ...

Conservatives on the Supreme Court have again rescued the nation from out-of-control bureaucrats inflicting prohibitive costs ...

An environmental lawyer who wrote an amicus brief in San Francisco v. EPA believes a criticized ruling actually means tougher ...

With its opinion in San Francisco v. EPA, the U.S. Supreme Court has again acted to "right" the implementation of the federal Clean Water Act ...

According to the New York Times, the Supreme Court made a decision on whether the Clean Water Act of 1972 allowed the E.P.A.

What was once a quiet trail used by locals has become a high-traffic destination,” said the letter proposing the pilot ...

In 5-4 ruling, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett joining liberal wing in dissent, the high court says EPA has the responsibility ...