A new ruling emphasizes that copyright laws protect only human-made art, leaving AI-generated works without any legal ...

A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., on Tuesday affirmed that a work of art generated by artificial intelligence ...

Copyright grants intellectual property protection to original works, giving their owners exclusive rights to reproduce, sell, ...

A recent kerfuffle over AI art forced the Balatro creator to get involved. A minor kerfuffle in the Balatro subreddit has led ...

The Supreme Court might be asked to review the case related to the artificial intelligence painting “A Recent Entrance to ...

The author writes "The U.S. Copyright Office has long maintained that copyright protection extends only to works exhibiting ...

The emergence of AI-generated artwork is noticeable in both creative and professional settings. Employees in engineering use ...

A minor kerfuffle in the Balatro subreddit has led developer LocalThunk to weigh in on the topic of AI-generated art, and his position is clear: It hurts artists, and it's not welcome. As ...

A U.S. federal appeals court today ruled that art created solely by artificial intelligence cannot be granted copyright protection.

The group that knew the story was AI-generated had a more negative view of it, finding it less authentic and evocative.

In recent years, the development of artificial intelligence has rekindled the old fear that machines will replace humans.