North Carolina’s Deborah Ross among 10 U.S. representatives who sign letter questioning if women athletes will be treated ...

U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken of the Northern District of California, approved a $2.576 billion settlement in House v. NCAA on June 6 that goes beyond merely expanding name, image and ...

There was a time when the SEC was the unquestioned king of college football as evidenced by 13 national titles over the last ...

Part 4 of our series on the future of college athletics focuses on the fate of mid-major programs as the power conferences ...

The settlement, however, may have the unintended consequence of pushing NIL deals, especially those outside of major Division ...

As athletes begin sharing in the revenue, the next decade will determine whether they gain real negotiating power. Part 1 of ...

The NCAA handed down its official ruling Friday from the Committee on Infractions hearing into the Michigan football case ...

For the first time in more than 50 years, as classes begin, students at North Carolina won't have the opportunity to try out ...

The implications of the NCAA's House settlement on revenue sharing with student athletes may have ripple effects on academic programs like accounting.

ATLANTA — As we put a bow on SEC media days, the excitement surrounding the start of the college football season is tempered a bit by an undercurrent of frustration involving collecting bargaining.

The House v. NCAA settlement passed and schools will begin paying players as part of the $2.8 billion revenue-sharing agreement, but where is the oversight?

OMAHA, Neb. — In June the University of Nebraska Omaha announced it will not opt in to the NCAA House settlement, which makes it so schools can now directly pay players through licensing deals.