Since 1970, rhetoricians have applied the ideas of Rogers—with contributions by Anatol Rapoport —to rhetoric and argumentation, producing Rogerian argument.

The Rogerian argument (or Rogerian rhetoric) is a form of argumentative reasoning that aims to establish a middle ground between parties with opposing viewpoints or goals.

Apr 29, 2025 · Rogerian argument is a negotiating strategy in which opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground.

Sep 3, 2024 · What is the Rogerian Argument? A Rogerian argument is a method of negotiation that aims to find common ground and mutual understanding between opposing viewpoints. Instead of …

A Rogerian argument helps you find that middle ground. Based on the work of psychologist Carl Rogers, a Rogerian argument can be extremely persuasive and can help you, as a writer, understand your …

Another approach our authors don't describe is called Rogerian argument. Based on Carl Rogers' work in psychology, Rogerian argument begins by assuming that a willing writer can find middle or …

Rogerian argument is often difficult for students to understand because it asks them to think about controversial topics in a different way: from the perspective of someone they disagree with.

The Rogerian argument is a debate format that can be used to defend your perspective while also acknowledging the opposing side of an argument. This type of argument is used to identify your own …

When used in argumentation, the Rogerian method allows for a dialogue to occur surrounding an issue. By examining counterarguments to your claims, you are able to view your position/ thesis from a …

Jan 21, 2026 · The Rogerian method of argumentation is exactly that. Rather than proving one side is right and the other is wrong, it looks at both sides to see the common ground and reach agreement.